Porcupine will only add this to the man's own words. He spends most of his time complaining about the source of the question, trying to make it appear sinister. Has he really been booked onto so many television talk shows to discuss his Clinton Global Initiative (characteristic modesty, there) that he forgot he was on Fox News? He seems annoyed that he is there. Did he perhaps confuse Chris Wallace with his father, and expect only puffball questions? He does not answer the questions 'on its merits' as he says he will. He repeatedly cites Richard Clark's book - what are his own observations? His portrait of FBI/CIA disjunction is dead on, and he is correct that nobody knew about Bin Laden in 1993. But Chris Wallace is equally accurate to ask why more attention was not paid in 1996 and 1998. Clinton's repeated condemnation of 'you people', and his putting words into the mouth of his interviewer which stem from his own bias is only kerosene upon our national disputes.